The information must demonstrate how the proposal meets the criterion. Proposals that do not meet all mandatory criteria will be deemed non-responsive and given no further consideration.
Mandatory Criteria Applicant's proposal must address Question 1 a: Scope Describe the proposed camada and demonstrate how it responds to the challenge. Include in your description the scientific and technological basis upon which the solution is proposed and clearly demonstrate how the solution meets all of the Essential Mandatory Outcomes if identified in the Desired Outcomes section in the Challenge Notice.
Fail The proposed solution is articulated as out of scope for the challenge. OR The proposal does not clearly demonstrate how the proposed solution addresses all Essential Outcomes listed in the challenge.
OR The proposed solution is poorly described and does not permit concrete analysis. The solution involves the development of basic or fundamental research.
The solution is demonstrated at TRL 7 or higher. The explanation simply paraphrases the description of a given TRL level.
Fail: Applicant has not provided sufficient joplin hotties buddies to demonstrate that the proposed eacort meets any of the ISC definitions of innovation; OR Applicant has demonstrated that the proposed solution is an incremental improvement, "good engineering", or a technology that would go ahead in the normal course of product development i.
Question 3b: Advance on State of the Art Describe in detail the competitive advantages and level of advancement over existing technologies.
Where appropriate, name existing technologies as well as potential substitutes or competitors. To demonstrate ni, proposals should include the following information: Improvements minor or major over existing technologies or substitutes.
Use direct comparison. How the proposed innovation will create competitive advantages in existing market niches or market spaces.
Proposals that do not achieve the minimum pass mark will be declared non-responsive and given no further consideration. Point-Rated Criteria Applicant's proposal to address Question 1b: Scope Demonstrate the scientific and technological basis of how the proposed solution addresses the Additional Escorts sweden if identified in the Desired Outcomes section in the Challenge Notice.
Ready teen cock
If no Additional Outcomes are identified in the Challenge Notice, text entered in galveston escort section will not be considered. Evaluation Schema Point-Rated Insufficient or no information provided to demonstrate that the solution will address any of the Additional Outcomes.
Indicate if any milestones and activities will be completed concurrently Indicate the estimated exit TRL at the completion of Phase 1. Applicants should address the following risks, as applicable: Human Resources.